I immediately became suspicious of the fast-track vaccines when the pharma companies were given immunity from liability for anyone who had adverse reactions. Then, when they started talking about using retrovirus techniques in the vaccine (mRNA), I got real suspicious, because what retroviruses do is modify the host's DNA. In fact, mRNA is how scientists do gene editing in laboratories. So, by injecting such a vaccine into a young person, it could have grave implications which are passed on to offspring, that is, if it doesn't make them sterile first. For old farts like me who are past child bearing age, it is not such a big deal, but the real life roll out in the UK has shown that high percentages (single digit, but high by comparison) of recipients can get either Bell's Palsy or go into anaphalactic shock, or both. And, by the way, this is not being publicized by the major media in Europe or the United States.
However, the information is getting out in other venues. The former head of Pfizer respiratory research points out:
- The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
- The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
- The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
- The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.
Not exactly a glowing endorsement, eh? The second bullet is especially troublesome. With widespread distribution of the vaccine, there is potential for mass sterilization of women.
People should not stand for this. Such a situation has the potential to be the poster child for "the cure being worse than the disease". The pharma companies have very little incentive to provide a really safe vaccine. After all, they have been granted immunity from any legal repercussions. One has to wonder at how a government that purports to be "for the people" could allow a situation like this to exist.
The consequences of injecting RNA into the human body are unknown. Should this vaccine become mandatory to participate in society, it is not inconceivable that we end up with an I Am Legend scenario.
As you consider this, think to yourself,
Think about it.If masks work, why do we need social distancing?
If social distancing works, why do we need masks?
If either one works, why do we need lockdowns?
If ANY of them work, why do we need new vaccines?
